Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 446.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Christopher Coons (D-DE)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill addresses counterfeit products in commerce and trade.
The problem
Counterfeit goods harm consumers, businesses, and the economy. Fake products are sold online and in stores, causing safety risks and financial losses.
The proposal
The bill creates stronger rules against selling fake products. It increases penalties for counterfeiting and improves enforcement by federal agencies.
The impact
Consumers get safer products. Legitimate businesses face less competition from fakes. Law enforcement gains more tools to stop counterfeiters.
Counterfeit products often lack safety standards and quality controls. Stronger enforcement helps keep dangerous fake goods off shelves and out of homes. Consumers can trust products more.
Real companies lose sales and reputation when counterfeits copy their products. Stricter rules level the playing field for honest businesses. Small companies especially benefit from reduced unfair competition.
Stopping counterfeiting protects tax revenue from legitimate businesses and imports. It also reduces government costs spent fighting fake goods. More enforcement resources can target the worst offenders.
Counterfeiting networks often fund other illegal activities and organized crime. Stronger penalties and enforcement make these operations riskier and less profitable. Law enforcement gets better tools to pursue these networks.
New rules require more government spending on inspectors, agents, and tracking systems. Taxpayers pay for increased enforcement. Resources might be stretched across many agencies.
Companies spend more on anti-counterfeiting measures and compliance. These costs may be passed to consumers through higher prices. Lower-income shoppers could be affected most.
Stricter checking of imported goods can slow customs processing. Businesses shipping products internationally face longer wait times. This may hurt international trade and small importers.
Without an official summary, the specific rules and penalties remain unclear. Businesses may struggle to understand what they must do to comply. Inconsistent enforcement could result across different regions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.