Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs. (text: CR S2280-2281)
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a pilot program to update flood maps and help homeowners better understand flood risks.
The problem
Current flood maps are outdated and don't reflect modern flooding patterns. Homeowners lack clear information about their actual flood risk and insurance needs.
The proposal
Establishes a pilot program to modernize flood mapping technology and create better tools for homeowners to learn their flood risk. Improves data collection methods.
The impact
Homeowners gain better flood risk information. Insurance companies get more accurate data. Communities can plan better. Some property values may shift based on new flood assessments.
Updated flood maps help homeowners understand real risks and make informed decisions about insurance and property protection. Accurate information prevents costly surprises during flooding events.
Communities can use accurate flood data to improve drainage systems and building codes. Better planning reduces flood damage and saves money long-term.
Current outdated maps cause some people to pay too much for insurance while others pay too little. New maps create more equitable pricing based on actual risk.
Accurate flood mapping attracts investment and development to safe areas. Reduces construction in high-risk zones, saving money and lives.
Homeowners in newly mapped flood zones may see property values fall sharply. This hurts people who bought in good faith with old information.
Updated maps will force some homeowners into higher flood insurance tiers. Monthly costs could increase significantly for middle-class families.
Modernizing flood maps requires expensive technology, data collection, and staff training. Taxpayers may bear these upfront costs with uncertain long-term benefits.
Lower-income neighborhoods may be disproportionately affected by higher flood risk designations, making housing less affordable in some communities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.