Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Adds a 30 percent tax on sheep and lamb products imported from Australia and New Zealand.
The problem
U.S. livestock producers face competition from Australian and New Zealand sheep and lamb imports, which may affect domestic farm prices and industry profitability.
The proposal
Imposes a 30 percent tariff duty on all sheep and lamb products originating from Australia or New Zealand entering the United States.
The impact
U.S. consumers pay higher meat prices, domestic sheep farmers gain competitive advantage, and trade relationships with these countries may become strained.
Domestic sheep and lamb producers face less competition from cheaper imports. This could help U.S. farmers maintain market share and stable prices for their products.
Tariff duties generate tax revenue for the federal government. The money collected could be used for government programs or deficit reduction.
Higher import prices may encourage consumers to buy American-raised lamb and sheep products. This could boost U.S. agricultural jobs and rural economies.
A 30 percent tariff will increase prices on lamb and sheep meat at grocery stores. Lower-income families may struggle more with food expenses.
Australia and New Zealand may retaliate with their own tariffs on American products like grain, beef, or technology. This could hurt other U.S. industries and farmers.
With fewer imported products, U.S. producers face less pressure to improve quality or efficiency. Consumers lose the benefits of product variety and competitive pricing.
Restaurants, butchers, and food companies that rely on affordable lamb imports will face higher costs. Many may pass these costs to their customers or reduce profit margins.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.