Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Reauthorizes federal funding and programs for restoring the Delaware River Basin's water quality and ecosystems.
The problem
The Delaware River Basin supplies drinking water to millions and supports important ecosystems. Existing restoration programs need renewal to continue environmental protection and water management efforts.
The proposal
Extends authorization for Delaware River Basin restoration programs, likely including funding for water quality improvements, habitat protection, and management initiatives across the multi-state region.
The impact
Affects millions relying on Delaware River for drinking water, river communities, environmental groups, and state/federal agencies managing water resources across Delaware, New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania.
Ensures millions of people have clean, safe drinking water. Continuous restoration maintains water quality for residential and industrial use across four states.
Protects fish, plants, and animals that depend on healthy river conditions. Restoration helps maintain biodiversity in one of the East Coast's important natural areas.
A healthy river supports fishing, boating, and tourism industries. Restored habitats can boost local economies and create outdoor recreation opportunities.
Reauthorization allows continued cooperation between federal government and four states. Unified management prevents competing interests from harming the shared river system.
Reauthorization commits taxpayer money to ongoing programs. Budget constraints may limit funding available for other federal priorities or deficit reduction.
Without an official summary, it's difficult to assess exact scope and effectiveness. Programs may have inefficiencies or outdated approaches not addressed by simple reauthorization.
Restoration programs often require environmental regulations and permits. Businesses and landowners near the river may face compliance costs and restrictions.
Reauthorizing existing programs may lock in older methods. Emerging environmental science might suggest better restoration strategies not included in renewed authorization.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.