Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Protects U.S. shrimp industry from foreign competition through trade measures.
The problem
U.S. shrimp producers face competition from imported shrimp, potentially affecting domestic fishing industry jobs and economic stability in coastal communities.
The proposal
The bill likely implements tariffs, quotas, or trade restrictions on imported shrimp to protect American shrimp harvesters and processors from foreign market competition.
The impact
Shrimp fishermen and processors benefit from protection. Consumers may face higher shrimp prices. Seafood importers and restaurants are negatively affected by trade restrictions.
Helps U.S. shrimp fishermen and processing workers keep their jobs. Supports coastal communities that depend on shrimp fishing for income.
Strengthens American shrimp businesses by reducing foreign competition. Encourages domestic production and investment in fishing infrastructure.
May address unfair trade practices by foreign shrimp producers. Levels playing field if other countries have lower labor or environmental standards.
Consumers will likely pay more for shrimp at grocery stores and restaurants. Low-income families spend larger portions of income on food.
Other countries may impose tariffs on American agricultural or manufactured goods. Could hurt different U.S. industries and workers in other sectors.
Seafood importers, wholesalers, and restaurants face higher costs and reduced profit margins. Small businesses may struggle more than large chains.
May violate international trade agreements or trigger legal challenges. Could harm U.S. trade relationships with partner countries.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10175
Banning Antiquated Duties and Delivering Equitable American Levies (BAD DEAL) Act of 2026
S 5381
ADVERSARIES Act
S 2677
A bill to expand the sharing of information with respect to suspected violations of intellectual property rights in trade.
S 5380
A bill to provide for a ten-year statute of limitations for export control violations under the Export Control Reform Act of 2018.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.