Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Allows state attorneys general to sue for damages when businesses illegally discriminate in pricing.
The problem
State attorneys general currently cannot sue for price discrimination damages under the Robinson-Patman Act, limiting enforcement of fair pricing rules that protect businesses from competitors getting better deals.
The proposal
Amends the Clayton Act to give state attorneys general the power to bring civil lawsuits for price discrimination damages on behalf of injured parties in their states.
The impact
Small and medium-sized businesses may gain protection from unfair pricing practices. Consumers could benefit indirectly. Large retailers and suppliers face increased legal risk and potential damages.
State attorneys general can better protect businesses and consumers from illegal price discrimination. This gives smaller competitors a stronger tool to challenge unfair pricing by larger companies.
Small and medium businesses often cannot afford private lawsuits. State enforcement helps level the playing field against large corporations offering better prices to favored buyers.
State attorneys general work at the local level and understand regional markets. They may be more responsive to local business concerns than federal enforcement alone.
The Robinson-Patman Act already prohibits price discrimination. This change simply ensures it is enforced more consistently across all states.
Companies could face more lawsuits from state attorneys general, even over legitimate pricing decisions. Legal costs and uncertainty may burden businesses of all sizes.
Companies might raise prices to cover increased legal exposure and damages. Consumers could ultimately pay more due to reduced price competition and efficiency.
Different states may interpret and enforce price discrimination rules differently. This creates inconsistency and makes it harder for companies to comply nationwide.
The Robinson-Patman Act is notoriously difficult to apply. Expanding enforcement may lead to disputes over what counts as illegal discrimination versus lawful pricing.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.