Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill would give government power to stop grocery stores from raising prices too much during emergencies.
The problem
Some people worry grocery stores charge unfairly high prices during crises like natural disasters or supply shortages, making food unaffordable for families.
The proposal
The bill would let federal authorities identify and punish grocery stores that raise prices excessively during declared emergencies or supply disruptions.
The impact
Grocery stores would face restrictions on pricing during emergencies. Consumers might pay lower prices then. Stores' profits could decrease during crisis periods.
During emergencies, low-income families struggle most with high prices. Price controls could keep essential food affordable when people need it most and have fewer options.
Stops companies from taking unfair advantage of emergencies to maximize profits. Creates fairness in how businesses treat customers during crises.
Keeps people from going hungry or choosing between food and medicine. Provides stability for families during unpredictable emergency situations.
If stores can't raise prices, they might stock less food or stop delivering to certain areas. Companies could prioritize other regions where they make better profits.
What counts as unfair pricing versus normal price increases is unclear. Disputes could lead to lawsuits and confusion about rules.
Large chains might handle price restrictions better than family-owned groceries. Small businesses with thin profit margins could struggle or close.
Companies need pricing flexibility to manage costs and respond to supply changes. Restrictions could hurt their ability to operate efficiently during crises.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.