Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 357.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Bill to protect and manage the Great Salt Lake through water conservation and restoration efforts.
The problem
The Great Salt Lake is shrinking due to water diversions and drought, threatening ecosystems, air quality, and regional economy.
The proposal
Establishes stewardship programs for water management, restoration projects, and coordination between federal, state, and local agencies.
The impact
Affects Utah residents, water users, environmental groups, and industries dependent on the lake's health and water supply.
Protects wildlife habitats and reduces toxic dust from exposed lake bed. Helps restore ecosystems that depend on the lake.
Brings together government agencies and stakeholders to solve problems together. Creates unified management strategy.
Reduces air pollution from salt dust that affects residents' breathing and health. Improves water quality for communities.
Protects recreation and tourism industries that depend on the lake. Supports long-term water security for businesses.
Conservation efforts may limit water available for agriculture and cities. Could increase costs for water users and farmers.
Restoration and management programs require significant federal spending. Taxpayers bear the financial burden.
Farmers may face water restrictions during dry periods. Could reduce crop production and farm income in region.
Coordinating multiple agencies and stakeholders can slow decision-making. Real problems may not be addressed quickly enough.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.