Latest action: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Water and Power. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 118-405.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal funding and programs for rural water supply development and management.
The problem
Rural communities often lack reliable, safe water infrastructure. Federal programs supporting rural water projects need renewal to continue helping these areas.
The proposal
Extends and reauthorizes the Rural Water Supply Program, allowing continued federal investment in water infrastructure projects serving rural communities and agricultural areas.
The impact
Rural residents, farmers, and small communities gain improved water access and safety. Federal budget allocates resources to water infrastructure in less-populated regions.
Rural communities often struggle with outdated or insufficient water systems. Reauthorizing this program ensures continued federal support for building and upgrading water infrastructure where private investment is limited.
Reliable water supply attracts businesses and residents to rural areas. Improved infrastructure can support agriculture, manufacturing, and other industries dependent on water availability.
Safe drinking water prevents disease and health problems in underserved communities. Federal funding ensures rural residents have access to water quality standards met by urban areas.
Farmers depend on reliable water for irrigation and livestock. Sustained federal investment helps agricultural communities maintain productivity and competitiveness.
Reauthorization commits federal taxpayer dollars to ongoing water programs. Some argue limited government budgets should prioritize other needs or let states fund local projects.
Without specific bill details, it is unclear how effectively existing programs use funds or if reauthorization includes oversight improvements and accountability measures.
Rural water programs may not reach the most isolated or poorest communities that lack capacity to apply for grants or manage infrastructure.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.