Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 623.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Bill transfers land near two Nebraska reservoirs from federal to state or local control.
The problem
Federal government owns land around Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs in Nebraska. State and local officials want control of these lands for management and development.
The proposal
The bill conveys specified federal lands adjacent to Swanson and Hugh Butler Reservoirs to Nebraska or local entities for management and beneficial use.
The impact
Nebraska gains control of reservoir lands. Local communities may develop or manage these areas. Federal government reduces land holdings in the region.
States and local governments often manage lands more efficiently for community needs. Local decision-making allows customized solutions for specific regional priorities and concerns.
Land conveyance may enable local recreation, tourism, or business development. Communities could generate revenue and jobs from reservoir area improvements.
Federal government transfers maintenance and management costs to states. This reduces federal spending on land management in Nebraska.
Local control may improve public access to reservoir areas for fishing, boating, and camping. Communities could enhance recreational infrastructure and facilities.
Federal protection standards may exceed state requirements. Land transfer could result in weaker environmental safeguards around sensitive water resources.
States assume responsibility for land maintenance, cleanup, and legal liabilities. Unforeseen costs could burden state and local budgets.
Private development or restrictions could limit public use of transferred lands. Communities might lose free recreational access to reservoir areas.
No official bill summary makes it difficult to assess specific terms, conditions, and affected areas. Lack of detail prevents full evaluation of consequences.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
2 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
2
citizens have voted on this bill
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.