Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 620.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Senate bill to help states prepare for and manage drought conditions through federal coordination and resources.
The problem
Many U.S. regions face severe droughts that threaten water supplies, agriculture, and communities. Better preparation and planning could reduce drought damage and protect public interests.
The proposal
The bill creates federal drought preparedness programs, coordinates between agencies, and provides funding for states to develop drought response plans and infrastructure.
The impact
States, farmers, water utilities, and communities affected by drought would gain federal support. Taxpayers fund the program. Water management agencies gain new responsibilities and resources.
Early planning and preparation can reduce damage when droughts happen. Communities can protect water supplies and plan ahead instead of reacting in crisis.
Farmers depend on water for crops and livestock. Federal drought preparedness helps protect agricultural businesses and rural communities from severe water shortages.
Different agencies managing water often don't communicate well. This bill brings federal, state, and local agencies together to share information and make better plans.
Helps cities and towns ensure people have drinking water during dry periods. Reduces risk of water shortages for millions of Americans.
Federal programs require funding. Taxpayers pay for drought preparedness programs, though the bill's cost is not specified in available information.
Creating new federal programs and agencies means government expands. Some believe state and local governments should handle water issues instead.
Different states have different water situations and needs. One federal program might not fit everywhere or solve local drought problems effectively.
More federal coordination can sometimes make decisions slower. States might face delays getting help when they need immediate drought response.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 2753
Urban Canal Modernization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.