Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Reduces regulatory requirements and paperwork burdens on businesses and commerce activities.
The problem
Businesses report excessive federal regulations and paperwork create costs and slow growth. Compliance burdens may disadvantage small companies competing with larger firms.
The proposal
Eliminates or streamlines federal regulations and reporting requirements for commercial activities. Reduces documentation and compliance procedures businesses must follow.
The impact
Businesses face lower compliance costs and less paperwork. Consumers and workers may see different market conditions. Government oversight and enforcement capabilities could change.
Removing paperwork and reporting requirements reduces expenses for companies. This frees money for hiring, investment, and growth. Especially helps small businesses with limited staff.
Less paperwork means companies spend less time on compliance. Businesses can respond faster to customers and markets. Reduces administrative burden on owners and employees.
Smaller companies often struggle more with complex regulations. Streamlining rules helps level the playing field. Allows small firms to compete with larger corporations.
Lower regulatory costs may increase business investment and hiring. Reduced friction in commerce could stimulate economic activity. More resources available for productive activities rather than compliance.
Less oversight and reporting may reduce consumer safety monitoring. Companies might have fewer accountability requirements. Product and service quality standards could become harder to enforce.
Removing environmental regulations could increase pollution and emissions. Companies might cut corners on sustainability practices. Natural resource protection could be weakened.
Reduced reporting requirements may lower workplace safety enforcement. Companies might cut safety measures to reduce costs. Workers could face greater injury or health risks.
Less reporting reduces visibility into tax compliance and wage payments. Illegal employment practices become harder to detect. Government revenue collection could decrease.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.