Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Designates Chí'chil Biłdagoteel as a historic district to preserve Native American cultural heritage.
The problem
A culturally significant Native American site needs formal protection and recognition to preserve its historical and cultural importance for future generations.
The proposal
The bill establishes Chí'chil Biłdagoteel as an official historic district, providing legal protection and recognition for the site's cultural and historical value.
The impact
Native American tribes gain protected status for sacred lands. Local communities may see restrictions on development. Federal government gains oversight responsibilities.
Protects an important cultural site for Native American tribes. Ensures future generations can access and learn about their history. Honors the significance of the location to tribal communities.
Official designation brings national attention to Native American history. Supports education about indigenous peoples and their contributions. Validates tribal historical claims and cultural importance.
Historic district status may attract visitors interested in Native American culture. Could generate economic activity for nearby communities. May create jobs in tourism and heritage sectors.
Historic designation provides legal tools to prevent unwanted development. Creates framework for managing land use. Gives tribes stronger voice in protecting their territory.
Property owners may face limits on what they can build or change. Could reduce land values for private property owners in the area. Restrictions might apply to nearby land as well.
Local and state control over the area decreases. Federal oversight creates additional bureaucracy. Decision-making becomes more complex and slower.
Government must spend money to protect and manage the site. Maintenance and preservation require ongoing funding. Taxpayers bear the expense for these efforts.
Historic protection may clash with local economic plans. Native American interests might conflict with nearby community needs. Disputes could arise over land access and use.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10306
Technical Correction to the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes of the Duck Valley Reservation Water Rights Settlement Act of 2025
HR 2388
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Project Lands Restoration Act
S 240
Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025
HR 10751
Tribal Oral Health Sovereignty Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
CONFERENCE OF PROVINCIALS OF NORTH AMERICA
via NATIONAL ADVOCACY CENTER OF THE SISTERS OF THE GOOD SHEPHERD
…raditional Cultural Place Chichil Biłdagoteel Historic District Act" (H.R. 7957). It aims to preserve the parts of Oak Flat that remain part of Tonto National Forest. This bill is important. There will be a need to build…
Q1 2026 total
all issues
LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS
via LEAGUE OF CONSERVATION VOTERS
….582, the Community Protection and Wildfire Resilience Act. Supported H.R. 7957, the Preserve the Traditional Cultural Place Chichil Biłdagoteel Historic District Act. Supported H.R.8003, the Expanding the Fast Track Act…
Q2 2026 total
all issues
Firms whose LDA filings mention this bill. One filing covers many bills — read as disclosed interest, not confirmed lobbying on this bill alone. Dollar amounts are each filer's total reported lobbying money for that reporting period across every issue in the filing. No public data breaks lobbying spending out by bill, so none of these figures is the amount spent on this bill.
Verify these filings on the Senate LDA database