Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 762.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Fixes technical errors in a water rights agreement between the federal government and Shoshone-Paiute tribes.
The problem
The original 2025 water rights settlement act likely contained errors or unclear language that need correction to properly implement the agreement between the tribes and government.
The proposal
The bill makes technical corrections and clarifications to the Shoshone-Paiute Tribes water rights settlement to ensure accurate implementation.
The impact
Shoshone-Paiute tribes and federal agencies managing Duck Valley Reservation water resources are affected to ensure correct execution of the settlement agreement.
Technical corrections ensure the water rights settlement works as intended. This prevents disputes and confusion between tribes and government agencies about water access and management.
Clarifying language strengthens the legal foundation of the Shoshone-Paiute tribes' water rights. This provides better protection for the tribes' long-term access to water resources.
Correcting errors early prevents lengthy lawsuits and disputes later. This saves time and money for both tribal and federal governments.
Without an official summary, it is unclear what exact corrections are being made. This makes it difficult for the public and other stakeholders to evaluate potential consequences.
Technical corrections sometimes have unexpected consequences for other parties. Without knowing the specifics, broader impacts cannot be fully assessed.
The lack of detailed information means fewer people can meaningfully review and comment on the changes. This reduces public oversight of the process.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 2388
Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe Project Lands Restoration Act
S 240
Crow Tribe Water Rights Settlement Amendments Act of 2025
HR 10751
Tribal Oral Health Sovereignty Act
S 1055
Indian Health Service Emergency Claims Parity Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.