Latest action: Message on Senate action sent to the House.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Emily Randall (D-WA)
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Returns land to the Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe in Washington state.
The problem
The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe seeks restoration of lands in Washington. Historical land issues affect the tribe's sovereignty and resources.
The proposal
The bill transfers specific project lands to Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe control. It recognizes tribal land rights and restores property.
The impact
The Lower Elwha Klallam Tribe gains land control and sovereignty. Local communities and federal land management may be affected.
The bill acknowledges Native American land rights and self-governance. It supports tribal sovereignty by returning control of lands to the tribe. This honors historical commitments and tribal government authority.
Land restoration gives the tribe resources for economic projects. The tribe can develop the land according to their needs and priorities. This may create jobs and revenue for tribal members.
The tribe can manage lands using traditional practices and conservation. Tribal management may improve ecosystem health and sustainability. The tribe has historical knowledge of the local environment.
The bill addresses past wrongs related to Native American lands. It reflects national effort to repair historical injustices. This supports reconciliation between tribes and federal government.
The bill transfers federal land to tribal control. The federal government loses management authority over these lands. This reduces federal property holdings and potential federal revenue.
The bill's specific terms and land descriptions are not publicly detailed. Implementation details about land transfers and management remain unclear. This creates uncertainty about actual impacts.
Local governments or communities may disagree with the land transfer. Regional stakeholders might have competing interests in the land. Conflicts could arise over land use and jurisdiction.
No official summary publicly explains the bill's specific provisions. The scope and details of land restoration are not transparent. Public understanding and input are limited.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 1055
Indian Health Service Emergency Claims Parity Act
S 1514
Quinault Indian Nation Land Transfer Act
HR 2400
Pit River Land Transfer Act of 2026
S 550
A bill to provide for the equitable settlement of certain Indian land disputes regarding land in Illinois, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.