Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 145.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Protects people from romance scams by requiring companies to prevent fraudulent schemes.
The problem
Criminals trick lonely people online into sending money by pretending to be in love with them. This costs victims billions yearly and causes emotional harm.
The proposal
The bill requires businesses to take steps to stop romance scams, report them to authorities, and protect customer information from scammers.
The impact
Consumers gain protection from fraud. Businesses must spend money on new safety systems. Law enforcement gets better reporting of scams.
Romance scams target lonely, elderly, and isolated people who lose life savings. Better protections help prevent devastating financial and emotional harm to these groups.
Requiring companies to report scams helps police catch criminals faster. Better prevention systems make it harder for scammers to operate.
Victims lose billions annually to romance scams. Prevention reduces these losses for individuals and reduces government spending on victim support.
Companies must warn customers about romance scam risks. This education helps people recognize and avoid falling for scams.
Companies must spend money on new systems to detect and stop scams. These costs may be passed to customers through higher fees.
Without an official bill text, it's unclear exactly what companies must do. Vague rules make compliance difficult and expensive.
Monitoring customer communications to find scams raises privacy questions. People may worry about how their messages are tracked.
New dating and messaging platforms might avoid the market due to compliance costs. This reduces options for legitimate users.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE
via AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR JUSTICE
…ificial intelligence liability. H.R 2481 Romance Scam Prevention Act. S. 841 Romance Scam Prevention Act. H.R. 1941 Preventing Deepfakes of Intimate Images Act. S. 278 Kids off Social Media Act. S. 281 TICKET Act.
Q1 2025 total
all issues
Firms whose LDA filings mention this bill. One filing covers many bills — read as disclosed interest, not confirmed lobbying on this bill alone. Dollar amounts are each filer's total reported lobbying money for that reporting period across every issue in the filing. No public data breaks lobbying spending out by bill, so none of these figures is the amount spent on this bill.
Verify these filings on the Senate LDA database