Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates national institutes to research and develop clean energy technologies.
The problem
The U.S. needs better coordination and funding for clean energy research to address climate concerns and energy independence while maintaining competitiveness.
The proposal
Establishes dedicated national institutes focused on clean energy research, development, and innovation with federal funding and coordination.
The impact
Researchers, energy companies, and communities gain access to centralized clean energy development. Taxpayers fund new federal institutes.
Dedicated institutes can accelerate development of solar, wind, battery, and other clean energy solutions. This may reduce long-term energy costs and environmental pollution.
New institutes require scientists, engineers, and support staff. This creates employment in research and development sectors across multiple states.
Domestic clean energy research reduces reliance on foreign energy sources. This strengthens national security and economic stability.
Federal institutes can partner with companies and attract private funding to clean energy projects. This multiplies the impact of public dollars.
Establishing and operating new institutes costs taxpayer money. Budget allocation depends on available federal resources and competing priorities.
New federal institutes add administrative overhead and potential delays in decision-making. This may slow innovation compared to private sector approaches.
Research outcomes are unpredictable. Taxpayers may fund projects that don't produce commercially viable solutions or real-world impact.
Institutes may locate in specific regions, benefiting some communities more than others. This could increase regional economic inequality.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.