Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates national institutes focused on developing and researching clean energy technologies.
The problem
The U.S. needs coordinated research and development infrastructure to advance clean energy solutions and reduce dependence on fossil fuels.
The proposal
Establishes new institutes under federal oversight to conduct research, develop clean energy technologies, and train scientific workforce in energy innovation.
The impact
Energy researchers, scientists, and companies gain access to federal research facilities. Taxpayers fund operations. Energy sector potentially shifts toward cleaner technologies.
Dedicated research institutes can accelerate development of solar, wind, and other clean technologies. This helps the U.S. compete globally in the growing clean energy market.
New institutes hire researchers, engineers, and support staff. This creates employment in high-skill scientific fields across multiple regions.
Successful clean energy research can lower costs of renewable technology over time. This benefits consumers and businesses through cheaper energy options.
Developing domestic clean energy reduces reliance on foreign oil and fossil fuel imports. This strengthens national security and economic stability.
Building and operating institutes costs significant federal money. This increases government spending and requires funding decisions about other programs.
No guarantee that new institutes will produce breakthrough technologies quickly. Some research investments may not yield practical applications.
Federal research priorities may shift with different administrations. This could disrupt long-term research projects or funding continuity.
Research institutes typically locate in areas with existing scientific infrastructure. Rural and economically disadvantaged areas may see fewer direct benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.