Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires data centers to benefit nearby communities through jobs, infrastructure, or other support.
The problem
Large data centers operate in communities but often don't share economic benefits locally. Residents may face increased energy use or environmental concerns without receiving direct advantages.
The proposal
The bill likely requires data centers to create community benefit agreements, provide local jobs, fund infrastructure projects, or offer other direct support to surrounding areas.
The impact
Data center companies, local communities, energy providers, and workers are affected. Communities may gain jobs and investment; companies face new requirements and costs.
Data centers could bring jobs and investment to communities. Local businesses might benefit from increased spending by workers and facility operations.
Required contributions could fund roads, schools, or utilities in areas hosting data centers. This improves quality of life for residents.
Communities bearing environmental or infrastructure costs from data centers receive compensation. This creates more balanced relationships between companies and residents.
Clear requirements prevent disputes and establish consistent expectations nationwide. Companies know what communities will require upfront.
Data centers must spend money on community benefits. These costs may be passed to customers through higher prices or reduce company profits.
Companies must negotiate and manage multiple community agreements. Unclear requirements could create confusion and legal disputes.
Strict requirements might push data centers to other states or countries. This could reduce job opportunities communities hoped to gain.
Without specific details on benefits required, enforcement and fairness remain unclear. Some communities might receive more than others.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
HR 7831
License to Drill Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.