Latest action: Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 676.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Bill expands hydropower development in rural areas to create jobs and generate clean energy.
The problem
Rural communities need economic growth and job opportunities. Hydropower could provide clean energy while supporting local economies through development projects.
The proposal
The bill authorizes new hydropower projects in rural regions, streamlines permitting processes, and provides funding to expand hydroelectric generation capacity.
The impact
Rural workers gain construction and operations jobs. Utilities and energy companies benefit from new infrastructure. Some communities and ecosystems face potential environmental changes.
Hydropower projects require construction workers, engineers, and permanent operating staff. Rural areas with limited employment gain stable, well-paying jobs. Local economies receive spending boosts from project development.
Hydropower produces electricity without greenhouse gases. Expanding it reduces reliance on fossil fuels. It contributes to clean energy goals and grid reliability.
Streamlined permitting reduces delays in project approval. Companies can build projects sooner, lowering costs. Faster development means quicker job creation and energy production.
Domestic hydropower reduces dependence on imported energy. More electricity generation strengthens national energy security. Local power production keeps energy dollars in communities.
Dams alter water flow, harming fish migration and aquatic ecosystems. Reservoirs flood existing habitats and forests. These changes can be permanent or take decades to recover.
Reservoir creation requires flooding land, displacing residents and businesses. Indigenous communities may lose ancestral lands and cultural sites. Compensation often does not fully replace lost resources.
Streamlined processes may skip important environmental and safety reviews. Faster approval means less community input and fewer protections. Agencies have less time to assess potential harms.
Job creation is often temporary—construction jobs end once projects finish. Operating facilities need fewer workers than construction phases. Rural areas may see disappointing long-term economic benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 4040
Dakota Water Resources Act Amendments of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.