Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a Federal Infrastructure Bank to finance transportation and infrastructure projects nationwide.
The problem
States and communities struggle to fund major infrastructure projects. Current funding mechanisms are fragmented and difficult to access for many regions.
The proposal
Establishes a federal bank that provides loans and financing for transportation, water, and infrastructure projects. Makes it easier for states and cities to fund big construction projects.
The impact
State and local governments gain new funding access. Construction workers, engineering firms, and communities benefit from more infrastructure projects getting built.
Creates a dedicated source of money for infrastructure projects that might not get built otherwise. Helps both wealthy and less wealthy communities access capital for roads, bridges, transit systems.
Construction and engineering jobs increase when projects get built. Local economies benefit from wages paid to workers and spending on materials.
Streamlined financing process could reduce delays in getting projects approved and started. Communities spend less time seeking money from multiple sources.
Better infrastructure attracts businesses and residents to communities. Improved transportation reduces shipping costs and travel times.
Projects financed by the bank must be repaid by states and cities. If projects underperform or revenues fall short, communities face budget crises and reduced services.
Bank decisions about which projects to fund could favor some regions over others based on politics rather than merit. Less-connected communities might struggle to access funding.
Federal taxpayers may have to cover losses if projects fail to generate expected revenue. Bad investments could cost taxpayers significant amounts.
Without clear guidelines, bank might fund projects that don't address the most critical infrastructure needs. Resources could go to projects that benefit some groups more than others.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.