Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Establishes federal programs to reduce flood damage and build community resilience against flooding.
The problem
Communities face increasing flood risks from storms and climate patterns. Current federal responses are fragmented. Local governments need better planning and funding for flood prevention.
The proposal
Creates coordinated federal flood reduction programs, funding mechanisms, and resilience planning requirements. Supports infrastructure improvements and community preparedness efforts.
The impact
Affected: homeowners, communities, local governments, insurers, and construction firms. Changes flood planning requirements and increases federal funding availability.
Better flood prevention saves lives and property. Communities with improved infrastructure suffer fewer losses during storms. Federal coordination improves effectiveness.
Provides federal funding and technical support for flood planning. Allows smaller communities to afford better protection. Supports local decision-making.
Flood prevention projects require construction workers, engineers, and planners. Infrastructure work stimulates local economies. Long-term maintenance creates ongoing employment.
Resilience planning can include wetland restoration and natural buffers. Environmental approaches work with nature to reduce flooding. Improves ecosystems.
New programs require significant taxpayer funding. Costs may grow over time. Budget impacts uncertain without detailed spending amounts.
Coordinating federal, state, and local efforts is complex. Different communities have different needs. Bureaucratic delays possible.
Federal programs may not address every community's specific flood risks. Rural areas might receive less attention. Funding distribution could be unequal.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.