Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Reauthorizes federal water technology and resilience programs to address infrastructure challenges.
The problem
Water systems face aging infrastructure, climate impacts, and technology gaps. Communities need updated federal programs to improve water safety and adapt to changing conditions.
The proposal
The bill extends and updates federal water technology initiatives and resilience programs. It authorizes continued funding for water-related research, development, and infrastructure projects.
The impact
Water utilities, communities, researchers, and water users benefit. Affects water quality, infrastructure investment, and preparedness for droughts and floods.
Authorizes funding to upgrade aging water systems that serve millions of Americans. Better infrastructure means cleaner water and more reliable service to communities.
Supports programs to help water systems prepare for droughts, floods, and extreme weather. Communities become more resilient to climate impacts and water emergencies.
Funds water technology research and development. New solutions improve efficiency, water quality, and conservation methods.
Continues structured federal programs for water management. Ensures consistent standards and support across states and regions.
Requires federal funding authorization for water programs. Critics worry about budget impacts and whether resources are spent efficiently.
Federal programs may limit states' ability to manage local water issues independently. States might prefer controlling water policy without federal involvement.
Reauthorization alone does not guarantee actual appropriations. Congress must separately approve money for these programs to function.
Complex programs require expertise and coordination among many agencies. Delays or inefficiencies in execution could limit benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 7250
To reauthorize the Fort Peck Reservation Rural Water System Act of 2000.
HR 10602
Ottawa County Environmental Infrastructure Act
HR 10533
Newton County Water Infrastructure Improvement Act
S 4040
Dakota Water Resources Act Amendments of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.