Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Prevents utility company executives from receiving bonus payments.
The problem
Utility executives receive large bonuses while ratepayers face high electricity costs. Critics argue bonuses are unwarranted when service reliability or customer costs are problematic.
The proposal
Prohibits electric, gas, and water utility executives from receiving performance bonuses or incentive pay.
The impact
Utility executives lose potential bonus income. Ratepayers may see lower costs if companies redirect bonus funds. Utility company operations and hiring could be affected.
If companies stop paying executive bonuses, they may reduce utility rates for customers. This could help families and businesses afford essential services like electricity and water.
Bonus restrictions may address public concern that executives earn excessive rewards while ratepayers struggle with high bills. This reflects voter concern about executive compensation.
Removes financial incentives that might encourage executives to prioritize profits over service quality or customer needs. Could shift focus to reliable, affordable utility service.
Talented executives may work for other companies or industries offering better compensation. Utilities might struggle to hire experienced leaders needed to manage complex operations.
Preventing bonuses does not guarantee rate cuts. Companies could keep savings as profit or use funds for other purposes instead of lowering customer bills.
Restricting private company compensation practices raises concerns about government interfering in business decisions. Could set precedent for regulating other industries.
Lower compensation may discourage experienced executives from staying, potentially harming infrastructure maintenance and emergency response capabilities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.