Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Transportation and Maritime Security.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to increase pay for Transportation Security Administration employees.
The problem
TSA employees may face compensation challenges that affect recruitment, retention, and workforce morale in airport security operations.
The proposal
Authorizes or mandates wage increases for TSA staff members to improve salaries and benefits across the agency.
The impact
TSA workers receive higher pay. Federal budget spending increases. Airport security operations may improve or face delays during implementation.
TSA employees earn more money, which can help them afford basic needs and improve their quality of life. Higher wages recognize the importance and difficulty of airport security work.
Better pay helps TSA recruit new employees and keeps experienced workers from leaving for other jobs. This creates a more stable, trained security workforce at airports.
Better-paid employees may be more focused and motivated at their jobs. A stable workforce with good training can lead to better security screening and fewer mistakes.
TSA workers spend wages in their local communities on housing, food, and goods. Higher pay means more spending and support for local businesses.
Raising TSA salaries costs taxpayer money that could be used for other programs or to reduce the budget deficit. The total cost depends on how big the raise is.
Airlines might pass some labor cost increases to travelers through higher ticket prices or fees. This could make flying more expensive for families and businesses.
If TSA staffing issues stem from training, equipment, or procedures rather than just wages, pay raises alone may not fix screening problems or long airport wait times.
Congress would need to find funding from other areas or increase the deficit. This limits money available for other transportation, infrastructure, or security priorities.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.