Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Extends a pilot program that helps people handle transportation issues in one place.
The problem
Travelers and drivers struggle when they need help with multiple transportation services at different offices. A pilot program addressing this inconvenience may expire without extension.
The proposal
The bill extends an existing one-stop pilot program that lets people access different transportation services from a single location instead of visiting multiple offices.
The impact
Drivers, travelers, and transportation agencies benefit from simplified access to services. State and local governments may face coordination costs to maintain participating centers.
People can handle multiple transportation tasks in one place instead of driving to several offices. This reduces wait times and travel hassles for the public.
Consolidating services at one location may reduce overhead costs by eliminating duplicate staff and facilities. Agencies could serve more people with existing resources.
One-stop centers make government services more user-friendly and accessible. People get better service when agencies work together in the same building.
Extending a successful pilot shows the program works and communities support it. This builds confidence in expanding the model to other areas.
Extension means continued federal spending on the pilot program. Budget costs may grow if the program expands to more locations.
A pilot only tests the idea in select areas and may not work equally well everywhere. Results from limited locations may not apply to all states or regions.
Getting different agencies to work together in one location requires significant planning and cooperation. Agencies may struggle to share space and resources effectively.
The bill extends the pilot but doesn't explain the permanent solution afterward. Without a clear end goal, the program could continue indefinitely requiring constant funding.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.