Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Direct the Coast Guard to update its policy on using medication to treat drug overdoses.
The problem
The Coast Guard may lack clear, updated policies for using overdose medications like naloxone when responding to medical emergencies at sea or in coastal areas.
The proposal
The bill directs the Coast Guard Commandant to review and update the official policy governing the use of medication for treating drug overdoses during Coast Guard operations.
The impact
Coast Guard personnel and people rescued at sea would be affected. The policy update could improve emergency medical response to overdose situations during Coast Guard operations.
Updated policies ensure Coast Guard personnel have clear guidance on using overdose medications. This can save lives during rescue operations at sea where medical help is far away.
A formal policy update ensures all Coast Guard units follow the same procedures. This reduces confusion and improves coordination across different Coast Guard stations.
Updating policy may increase availability of naloxone and similar medications on Coast Guard vessels. This allows faster treatment when someone overdoses during a rescue.
The policy update reflects modern overdose prevention practices used across emergency services. This modernizes Coast Guard practices to match current medical standards.
Training personnel and purchasing medications costs money. The bill does not specify funding, so costs may come from existing Coast Guard budgets.
The bill only addresses Coast Guard policy, not broader drug overdose prevention. Many overdoses happen on land where Coast Guard involvement is rare.
The bill does not specify what the updated policy must include. This vagueness may result in inconsistent or minimal changes.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.