Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Sets new energy efficiency standards for appliances and equipment.
The problem
Buildings and appliances consume significant energy. Better efficiency standards could reduce waste and lower energy costs for consumers.
The proposal
Establishes minimum energy efficiency requirements for various appliances and equipment to reduce energy consumption.
The impact
Affects manufacturers, appliance makers, and consumers through new product standards and potentially higher upfront costs but lower utility bills.
More efficient appliances use less electricity and gas. Consumers could save money on utility bills over time. These savings could pay back the higher upfront cost.
Using less energy means power plants produce less pollution. This improves air quality and reduces greenhouse gases. Communities near power plants benefit most.
Manufacturing and installing efficient equipment creates jobs. Energy auditing and weatherization work expands. New industries develop around efficiency technology.
Lower energy demand reduces reliance on foreign energy sources. This strengthens national security and reduces energy price volatility.
Efficient appliances often cost more upfront than basic models. Low-income families may struggle to afford replacements. This creates a barrier to purchasing new products.
Companies must redesign products to meet new standards. Compliance costs money and time. Smaller manufacturers may struggle more than large ones.
Strict standards may eliminate cheaper, less efficient options. Consumers have fewer choices in price ranges. Some people prefer older, simpler equipment.
New efficient technology may be unreliable or have hidden problems. Consumers become early adopters of untested products. Repairs and warranties could cost more.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.