Latest action: Referred to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Allows states more freedom in how they spend federal highway funding.
The problem
States often face strict rules about how they must use federal highway money, limiting flexibility to address local transportation needs and priorities.
The proposal
The bill increases state flexibility in spending federal highway funds by relaxing federal restrictions and allowing broader use of transportation dollars.
The impact
States gain control over highway spending; federal government has less oversight. Drivers and communities depend on state decisions about road quality and projects.
States can respond faster to their own transportation problems instead of following one-size-fits-all federal rules. Communities get roads fixed based on what they actually need, not federal priorities.
Fewer federal rules mean less paperwork and red tape. Roads and bridges could get built or repaired more quickly without waiting for federal approval.
States can spend highway funds where they create the most value locally. This could mean less wasted money on projects that don't match regional needs.
States could experiment with new solutions like better transit, bike lanes, or traffic technology without federal restrictions limiting their choices.
Federal rules help prevent waste and corruption. Weaker oversight could lead to poor spending decisions or misuse of taxpayer money in some states.
Wealthy states can afford more highway improvements, while poorer states might neglect their roads. This increases inequality between regions.
Federal rules protect air quality and require environmental review. Relaxing these rules might lead to pollution and harm to environment.
Different states might set different safety standards for roads and bridges, creating confusion for travelers and potentially unsafe conditions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.