Latest action: Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to stop federal electric vehicle charging station funding programs.
The problem
The bill responds to concerns about federal spending on electric vehicle infrastructure and questions about the effectiveness of current EV charging programs.
The proposal
The bill would eliminate or defund federal programs that pay for building and operating electric vehicle charging stations across the country.
The impact
EV charging infrastructure expansion would slow. States, businesses, and EV drivers would face fewer charging options. Energy and automotive sectors would be affected.
The bill would cut federal government spending on EV charging programs. This could lower overall federal budget deficits and reduce taxpayer funding for these initiatives.
Private companies and states could take the lead on charging infrastructure. This may encourage market-driven solutions and competition among charging companies.
The bill reflects concerns about whether the federal government should fund charging infrastructure. It questions if this is properly a federal responsibility.
Fewer charging stations may discourage people from buying electric vehicles. Without government support, charging networks might grow more slowly, especially in rural areas.
Private companies focus on profitable urban areas first. Rural and poorer communities may have minimal charging options without federal support and funding.
Fewer EVs on the road means more gas-powered vehicles. This makes it harder for the U.S. to reduce pollution and meet climate commitments.
The bill would end programs already funded or in progress. States and companies that planned infrastructure projects may face disruptions and financial losses.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.