Latest action: Committee on Environment and Public Works Senate Subcommittee on Transportation and Infrastructure. Hearings held.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Sponsor
Kevin Cramer (R-ND)
Filed in the Senate.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Allows states to move highway funding between different transportation projects more easily.
The problem
States have limited flexibility in how they use federal highway funds, which can prevent them from redirecting money to projects that better meet local needs.
The proposal
The bill increases state authority to transfer federal highway funding between different project categories without strict federal restrictions.
The impact
States gain more control over highway spending. Federal oversight decreases. Local communities may see different project priorities funded.
States know their transportation needs better than federal government. Allowing transfers lets them solve local problems faster. This can make highway systems work better for each region.
States won't waste time waiting for permission to move money between projects. Reducing bureaucracy speeds up construction and repairs that communities need.
States can respond to unexpected needs like emergency repairs or changing priorities. This makes spending more efficient when situations change.
Less federal paperwork means states spend more time on actual projects instead of filling out forms. This could lower administrative costs.
Federal rules exist to ensure funds are spent fairly and safely. Fewer restrictions could allow misuse or poor project choices. States might not follow consistent safety standards.
Wealthy states might spend better and faster. Poorer states could struggle to manage flexible funding. This could increase transportation inequality across America.
State leaders might direct highway money to politically popular projects rather than most-needed ones. This could waste taxpayer money on lower-priority work.
Federal requirements help ensure highways are safe for everyone. Allowing transfers without oversight might compromise safety features in some projects.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.