Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill encourages nuclear power plants to use locally-sourced materials for construction and operations.
The problem
Nuclear energy development may rely on imported materials, increasing costs and supply chain vulnerabilities for domestic nuclear projects.
The proposal
The bill promotes policies and incentives to source nuclear plant materials from local U.S. suppliers and manufacturers.
The impact
Nuclear industry workers, manufacturers, energy companies, and communities hosting nuclear facilities experience job creation and economic activity changes.
Local sourcing of materials could create manufacturing and construction jobs in communities. This supports domestic employment in the energy sector and related industries.
Reducing reliance on imported materials strengthens U.S. energy security. It makes nuclear development less dependent on foreign supply chains.
Supporting local suppliers boosts regional economies where nuclear projects operate. Communities benefit from increased business activity and tax revenue.
Local sourcing may reduce shipping times and logistics complexity. This could speed up nuclear plant construction timelines.
Local materials and suppliers may be more expensive than international options. This could increase construction costs and nuclear energy prices for consumers.
U.S. manufacturers may lack capacity or expertise to produce specialized nuclear materials. The bill might force reliance on less qualified or efficient domestic suppliers.
Prioritizing domestic materials over international sources could create trade disputes. Other countries might retaliate against U.S. protectionist policies.
Restricting material choices to local sources might limit access to highest-quality components. This could affect nuclear safety standards and plant performance.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.