Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 563.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Reauthorizes federal funding for regional ocean partnership programs through 2031.
The problem
Regional ocean partnerships need continued federal support to manage coastal resources, conduct research, and coordinate conservation efforts across multiple states.
The proposal
Extends authorization for regional ocean partnerships, likely renewing funding levels and program requirements for organizations managing ocean and coastal issues.
The impact
Coastal communities, fishing industries, environmental organizations, and state governments benefit from continued coordination on ocean management and conservation.
Regional partnerships help states work together on shared ocean and coastal challenges. This reauthorization ensures continued cooperation on issues like fishing management, marine conservation, and emergency response.
These partnerships fund research on ocean health, climate change impacts, and marine ecosystems. Reauthorization allows important data collection to continue.
Healthy ocean management supports fishing industries, tourism, and recreation. Partnership programs help maintain these valuable economic activities.
Regional coordination helps communities prepare for hurricanes, oil spills, and other ocean-related emergencies through shared resources and planning.
Reauthorization extends federal budget commitments for these programs. Critics question whether programs are cost-effective compared to other priorities.
Without an official summary, it's unclear what changes are made or whether previous programs achieved their goals. Reauthorization may continue ineffective approaches.
Ocean partnerships may impose new rules on fishing, development, or other activities. Some industries worry about increased restrictions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.