Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
Bill is filed in its originating chamber and assigned a number.
Filed in the House.
Next: In Committee
Members of the committee(s) the bill was referred to
Bill aims to improve walking and biking routes connecting parks to neighborhoods.
The problem
Many Americans lack safe, convenient walking and biking paths to reach parks. Communities need better active transportation infrastructure to improve public health and reduce car dependence.
The proposal
The bill directs federal funding toward building and improving pedestrian and bicycle pathways that connect residential areas to parks and recreational facilities.
The impact
Urban and suburban residents gain better access to parks through safer routes. Communities receive federal grants for infrastructure projects. Local governments plan and implement new paths.
More walking and biking routes encourage people to exercise regularly. This can reduce obesity and health problems linked to sedentary lifestyles. Communities see improved fitness and wellbeing.
More people walking or biking means fewer cars on roads. This reduces air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. Communities work toward cleaner air and climate goals.
Federal money helps neighborhoods build infrastructure they might not afford alone. Communities can improve their parks and outdoor spaces. Local economies benefit from construction jobs.
Low-income neighborhoods often lack safe park access. Federal funding can help close these gaps. Residents gain equal recreation opportunities regardless of income.
Building and maintaining pathways requires significant federal spending. Taxpayers fund projects nationwide. Budget impacts other government priorities.
Federal money builds paths, but local governments pay for upkeep. Small towns may struggle with long-term maintenance costs. Infrastructure might deteriorate without ongoing funding.
Not all neighborhoods need this type of infrastructure equally. Rural areas may benefit less than cities. Funding allocation could be difficult and controversial.
Projects face land acquisition, environmental reviews, and local planning delays. Completion times are often longer than expected. Results may take years to materialize.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
S 3258
Aviation Medication Transparency Act of 2026
S 759
Modernizing Access to Our Public Oceans Act
S 3257
John A. Hauser Mental Health in Aviation Act
HR 5109
Transportation Worker Identification Credential Efficiency Act
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.