Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates planning process for rail and highway transmission infrastructure projects.
The problem
Current system lacks coordinated planning between rail and highway transmission projects, causing inefficiencies and delays in infrastructure development.
The proposal
Establishes joint planning framework requiring coordination between rail and highway authorities for transmission infrastructure projects and their routing.
The impact
Affects transportation agencies, utility companies, landowners, and communities through changes to how transmission projects are planned and approved.
Bringing rail and highway planning together could reduce conflicts and overlapping projects. This might save money and time by avoiding duplicate work.
A unified planning process could streamline decision-making and reduce bureaucratic delays. Projects might move forward more quickly with clear guidelines.
Combined planning could minimize land use and environmental impacts by consolidating projects. Fewer separate construction projects means less overall disruption.
Coordinated infrastructure development could reduce overall costs through shared resources and avoiding redundant planning efforts across agencies.
Adding coordination requirements creates more bureaucracy and agencies to involve in decisions. This could make the process slower or more complicated.
Different agencies have different rules and priorities. Getting them to agree on planning could be difficult and may require significant changes.
Requiring coordination between multiple agencies might actually slow approvals if agencies disagree. Projects could be stuck waiting for consensus.
Without details on the bill's requirements and enforcement mechanisms, full costs and benefits cannot be accurately assessed.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.