Latest action: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 605.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Senate Majority Leader schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Changes the term 'gilsonite' to 'asphaltite' in mineral leasing laws.
The problem
Existing federal mineral leasing law uses outdated terminology 'gilsonite' that may not accurately reflect current scientific or industry naming conventions for this mineral resource.
The proposal
Replaces all references to 'gilsonite' with 'asphaltite' throughout the Mineral Leasing Act to update terminology and ensure consistent naming with current standards.
The impact
Mining companies, regulators, and states leasing mineral rights are affected. Updates language used in contracts, permits, and legal documents governing this mineral's extraction.
Using 'asphaltite' aligns terminology with current geological and scientific naming standards. This reduces confusion and ensures legal documents match how the industry and scientists refer to the material.
Consistent naming throughout federal law makes it easier for companies and regulators to understand rules and requirements. It reduces potential disputes over terminology in contracts and permits.
This is a technical, non-controversial change that updates language without altering actual rights or responsibilities. Implementation is straightforward for all parties involved.
Government agencies and companies must update documents, databases, and procedures to use new terminology. This requires staff time and resources even though no policy actually changes.
Old contracts and historical documents will still reference 'gilsonite.' This could create temporary confusion when comparing old and new materials or researching past agreements.
A name change alone does not improve environmental protections, increase transparency, or address substantive mining practices. The actual value of this change is primarily administrative.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.