Latest action: Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
Originating chamber has voted to pass. Sent to the other chamber.
The House voted to pass the bill. It now moves to the Senate, which repeats the committee referral and floor-vote process.
Next: Passed Both Chambers
Conference committee (if versions differ), then the President
Requires federal cost-sharing programs to track and report spending accountability.
The problem
Federal cost-sharing programs lack clear tracking and reporting mechanisms, making it difficult to verify how shared costs are allocated and whether programs operate efficiently.
The proposal
The bill establishes accountability requirements for federal cost-sharing programs, including tracking mechanisms and reporting standards to ensure transparency in how costs are distributed.
The impact
Federal agencies, state/local governments, and program participants face new reporting requirements. Taxpayers gain visibility into cost-sharing spending. Programs may experience administrative changes.
Citizens and oversight bodies can better track how federal cost-sharing money is spent. This allows Congress and the public to verify programs work as intended.
Improved tracking helps identify inefficiencies and waste in federal programs. Agencies can use this data to improve program design and spending decisions.
Clearer reporting requirements make it harder for misuse or fraudulent cost-sharing claims to go undetected. Better oversight protects taxpayer money.
State and local partners know what documentation and records are expected. Standardized requirements level the playing field across different programs.
Agencies and state/local partners must create new tracking systems and reporting procedures. This costs money and staff time, potentially delaying program delivery.
Federal agencies need budget increases to build compliance infrastructure. These costs reduce funds available for actual program services.
Without detailed guidance in the bill, agencies may interpret accountability rules differently, creating confusion and inconsistent compliance across programs.
New reporting requirements could slow down cost-sharing approvals and disbursements, affecting people waiting for program benefits.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1611
Expressing support for the designation of October 8, 2026, as "National Hydrogen and Fuel Cell Day".
HR 10687
Utility Affordability and Transparency Act
HR 10674
National Institutes of Clean Energy Act of 2026
S 5645
Data Center Community Empowerment Act of 2026
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.