Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill addressing immigration fairness and freedom provisions for Congress 119.
The problem
Current immigration policies lack specific fairness measures or freedom protections that some believe should be reformed or clarified.
The proposal
Bill modifies immigration procedures and policies, but specific changes are unavailable in current committee materials.
The impact
Immigrants, immigration agencies, employers, and communities would be affected by policy changes once bill details are finalized.
Could make immigration procedures clearer or faster. Fairer rules might help people understand what to expect. This could reduce confusion and waiting times.
Immigration reforms could help businesses find workers they need. Clearer policies might encourage legal immigration pathways. This could benefit employers and the labor market.
Fairness provisions could ensure consistent and equal treatment. Standardized rules help prevent unfair decisions. This strengthens confidence in the immigration system.
Without detailed bill text, impacts cannot be fully assessed. Vague provisions might create legal challenges. Implementation costs and procedures remain unknown.
Immigration changes could raise questions about border security measures. Some might worry about enforcement gaps. Security impacts depend on specific provisions.
New procedures might require immigration agencies to hire more staff. Processing changes could be costly and complex. Agencies need time to adapt to new rules.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10896
To terminate the diversity immigrant visa program.
HR 10845
Port Staffing Reporting Act
HR 10799
Protecting American Workers Through H–1B Modernization Act
HR 10740
To designate Ukraine under section 244 of the Immigration and Nationality Act to provide certain nationals of Ukraine with continued eligibility for temporary protected status, and for other purposes.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
CASA, INC.
via CASA, INC.
…(SECURE Act), H.R. 1589 (American Dream and Promise Act of 2025), and H.R. 3127 (Fairness to Freedom Act of 2025). The case of Kilmar Abrego Garcia.
Q2 2025 total
all issues
Firms whose LDA filings mention this bill. One filing covers many bills — read as disclosed interest, not confirmed lobbying on this bill alone. Dollar amounts are each filer's total reported lobbying money for that reporting period across every issue in the filing. No public data breaks lobbying spending out by bill, so none of these figures is the amount spent on this bill.
Verify these filings on the Senate LDA database