Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires ports to report staffing levels to Congress.
The problem
Congress may lack information about how many workers staff U.S. ports and whether staffing is adequate for operations and security.
The proposal
The bill mandates that ports submit regular reports about their staffing numbers and employment information to congressional committees.
The impact
Port operators must track and report staffing data. Congress gains visibility into port workforce levels. Potentially affects port operations and security oversight.
Congress will have factual data about port staffing to make informed decisions about port security and operations. This increases transparency and accountability in maritime operations.
Regular reporting can reveal whether ports have enough workers to operate safely and securely. This may help prevent accidents and security vulnerabilities.
Data on port staffing helps policymakers understand workforce needs and plan training or hiring initiatives for the maritime industry.
Port operators must spend time and money collecting and submitting staffing reports to Congress. This increases compliance costs for ports nationwide.
Without an official summary, it's unclear exactly what data ports must report, how often, or in what format. This creates uncertainty for port operators.
Reporting alone doesn't solve staffing problems. Without follow-up legislation to address shortages, reports may generate data without meaningful change.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.