Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to keep illegal drugs out of schools through prevention and enforcement measures.
The problem
Drug use and trafficking in schools harm student safety, health, and learning. Schools need better tools to prevent drug problems.
The proposal
The bill establishes programs and policies to reduce drug availability in schools. It likely funds prevention education and increases school safety measures.
The impact
Students, teachers, school administrators, and families are affected. The bill aims to make schools safer from drug-related threats and problems.
Drug prevention efforts can reduce substance abuse among young people. A drug-free environment helps students focus on learning. Schools with fewer drug problems report better academic outcomes.
Keeping drugs out of schools protects developing brains from substance damage. Early prevention is more effective than treating addiction later. Fewer young people would start using drugs.
Drug-related activities often lead to violence and theft in schools. Preventing drugs can reduce discipline problems and criminal activity. Teachers and staff can spend more time teaching.
Prevention programs help families and communities understand drug dangers. Education can change attitudes about substance use. Healthy schools support healthier neighborhoods.
Drug prevention programs are expensive to create and maintain. Schools already struggle with limited budgets. The bill may not provide enough funding for all schools.
Stricter enforcement might involve searching students or monitoring activities. Privacy protections need careful balance with safety measures. Students could feel targeted or mistrusted.
Some drug prevention programs have mixed results in research studies. What works in one school may not work in another. Resources might be spent on ineffective approaches.
Stricter policies can be applied differently in different schools or communities. Some students might face harsher consequences than others. Enforcement could worsen existing inequality issues.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10895
Teaching Engaged Citizenship Act of 2026
HR 10868
Protecting Students from Sexually Explicit Materials Act
HRES 1625
Expressing support for a whole child approach to education and recognizing the role of parents, educators, and community members in providing a whole child approach to education for each student.
HRES 1623
Expressing support for the recognition of October 2026, as "National Dyslexia Awareness Month".
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.