Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Requires employers to pay workers double their regular wage when they work overtime hours.
The problem
Workers who work extra hours beyond standard schedules may not receive fair compensation for their additional labor and time sacrifices.
The proposal
Changes overtime pay rules to require employers pay workers double their regular hourly rate instead of current overtime pay formulas for hours worked beyond standard schedules.
The impact
Affects hourly workers, employers, and businesses. Workers could earn more for overtime. Companies face higher labor costs and may adjust hiring, schedules, or prices.
Employees who work overtime would receive double pay instead of time-and-a-half or current rates. This increases take-home pay for working families and rewards workers for extra hours.
If overtime becomes expensive, employers might hire additional staff instead of having current workers stay late. This could create more jobs and spread work across more people.
Higher overtime costs make employers less likely to require extended hours. Workers could spend more time with family and have better health from reduced overwork.
Ensures workers receive significantly more compensation for their time. Helps close the gap between regular and overtime earnings for lower-wage workers.
Companies face doubled overtime expenses, raising operating costs. Small businesses with tight budgets may struggle more than large corporations with more financial flexibility.
To control costs, employers might hire fewer workers, reduce hours, or cut positions. Some workers could lose jobs or see their schedules reduced significantly.
Businesses may pass higher labor costs to customers through price increases. Consumers could pay more for goods and services, affecting affordability.
U.S. companies face higher labor costs than international competitors. This could make American businesses less competitive in global markets and affect exports.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HRES 1607
Expressing support for the designation of September 2026 as "National Workforce Development Month".
HR 10703
Protecting Workers’ Benefits Act
S 5615
VEST Act
S 5646
Direct Seller and Real Estate Agent Harmonization Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.