Latest action: Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 40 - 13.
Committee has approved the bill (usually with amendments) and sent it back to the full chamber.
The committee voted to send the bill to the floor of the full chamber. The Speaker of the House schedules a floor vote.
Next: Passed One Chamber
The other chamber (Senate or House) repeats the committee + floor-vote process
Amends federal law to support restoration efforts in San Francisco Bay.
The problem
San Francisco Bay faces environmental degradation from pollution, habitat loss, and water quality issues requiring coordinated federal restoration action.
The proposal
Modifies the Federal Water Pollution Control Act to establish or enhance restoration programs and protections specifically for San Francisco Bay.
The impact
Bay residents, environmental organizations, water agencies, and businesses depend on the bay are affected by restoration funding and regulatory changes.
Dedicated federal attention to bay restoration could improve water quality, restore wetlands, and protect fish habitats. This benefits ecosystems and species that depend on the bay.
Cleaner water reduces pollution exposure for swimmers, fishermen, and communities around the bay. Better water quality supports recreation and subsistence fishing.
Restoration projects create jobs in construction, environmental science, and monitoring. Healthier bay ecosystems support tourism and commercial fishing industries.
Federal authority can coordinate efforts across multiple jurisdictions and agencies. This breaks down barriers between local, state, and federal management.
Bay restoration requires significant federal funding that adds to overall government spending. Costs may be passed to taxpayers or reduce funding for other priorities.
New federal rules could increase compliance costs for industries, water agencies, and developers operating near the bay. Small businesses may face disproportionate expenses.
Without detailed summary, specific requirements and timelines are unclear. Ambiguous language could lead to conflicts over how restoration is defined and measured.
Federal intervention may override local preferences or existing state programs. Communities that prefer different priorities could lose input in bay management decisions.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10823
Northwest Wetlands Voluntary Incentives Program Act
HR 10790
Chemical Safety Board Accountability Act
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
S 5604
Improving Species Recovery Act
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.