Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates voluntary incentive programs to encourage landowners to protect and restore wetlands in the Northwest.
The problem
Wetlands in the Northwest face degradation from development and land use changes. Protecting them requires cooperation from private landowners who may lack financial incentives.
The proposal
Establishes voluntary programs offering financial incentives and technical assistance to private landowners in Northwest states who protect, restore, or improve wetland ecosystems on their property.
The impact
Landowners, conservation organizations, and local ecosystems benefit. Wetland-dependent wildlife, water quality, and flood protection improve. Program costs affect federal budget and participating states.
Voluntary programs encourage private landowners to participate without government mandates. Incentives make wetland protection financially attractive. This builds partnerships between government and private sector.
Restored wetlands provide wildlife habitat, filter water pollution, and reduce flooding. These natural services protect communities and biodiversity. Benefits extend beyond participant properties.
Landowners can earn income while keeping their land. This creates economic incentives for conservation in rural areas. Programs support agricultural and forestry communities.
Voluntary programs allow customized solutions for different regions and property types. Participation is optional, reducing resistance from landowners. Success depends on attractive incentive levels.
Incentive payments and program administration require taxpayer funding. Long-term costs are unclear without knowing participation rates. Budget impact depends on incentive payment levels.
Without strong incentives, landowners may not participate enough to meet conservation goals. Voluntary programs might protect less land than required regulations. Success depends on how attractive payments are.
Programs need staff, funding, and coordination across multiple states. Establishing standards and verifying compliance requires administrative capacity. Startup and ongoing costs could be substantial.
Ensuring landowners maintain wetland protections long-term requires monitoring and enforcement. Voluntary programs may lack strict accountability mechanisms. Programs need clear rules about payment requirements if protections fail.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Other bills in this policy area
HR 10790
Chemical Safety Board Accountability Act
HR 10776
To amend the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972 to change certain requirements regarding certain allowed take of marine mammals, and for other purposes.
HR 10774
SWIMS Act of 2026
HRES 1606
Expressing support for the designation of the week of October 24, 2026, to October 31, 2026, as "Bat Week".
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.