Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Natural Resources.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Amends the Marine Mammal Protection Act to change how many marine mammals can be legally taken.
The problem
Current rules about taking marine mammals may need adjustment to balance marine mammal protection with human activities like fishing.
The proposal
Changes requirements for how many marine mammals can be allowed to be taken under the Marine Mammal Protection Act of 1972.
The impact
Affects fishing industries, marine conservation groups, coastal communities, and marine animal populations through revised take allowances.
The bill may simplify confusing rules about how many marine mammals can be taken. Clearer rules help fishing businesses know what they can and cannot do. This reduces confusion and disputes.
If the bill allows more marine mammal take, fishing industries may face fewer restrictions. This could help fishing communities maintain their livelihoods and economic stability.
Changing take allowances gives regulators more tools to manage marine mammals based on current conditions. This flexibility can help balance environmental and economic needs.
Adjusted rules might reduce conflicts between fishermen and environmental groups. This could lead to more cooperation in managing ocean resources.
Allowing more marine mammals to be taken could hurt animal populations. Species that are already endangered or threatened could decline further.
If the changes weaken protections, the bill could undermine decades of marine conservation work. Legal protections put in place to save species might become less effective.
Marine mammals play important roles in ocean ecosystems. Reducing their numbers could harm fish populations, water quality, and ocean health that many industries depend on.
The bill's exact changes are unclear because no summary was provided. This makes it hard to know if benefits outweigh harms.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
No donor data found for current cycle
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.