Latest action: Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill aims to increase federal efforts to combat Lyme disease research and prevention.
The problem
Lyme disease cases continue rising, but federal coordination and research funding remain fragmented across multiple agencies.
The proposal
Bill would coordinate Lyme disease efforts across government agencies and potentially increase research and prevention funding.
The impact
Lyme disease patients, researchers, public health agencies, and Americans in tick-prone areas would be affected by policy changes.
Centralizing Lyme disease efforts across agencies could reduce duplication and improve communication. It may lead to more consistent prevention messages and better research outcomes.
Greater federal attention could boost funding for Lyme disease research, diagnostics, and treatments. This may accelerate development of better testing methods and vaccines.
A coordinated federal approach could fund better public education about tick prevention and early symptoms. This might reduce infections and complications from delayed treatment.
The bill may establish clearer pathways for patient resources and support services. Better coordination could help underdiagnosed patients receive appropriate care.
Coordinating efforts and expanding programs likely requires additional federal spending. This adds to the budget deficit unless funds are redirected from other programs.
Without seeing the full bill text, specific mandates and implementation details are unknown. This could create ambiguous requirements for agencies to follow.
Some argue states and local health departments already handle Lyme disease effectively. Additional federal coordination might duplicate existing efforts or undermine state programs.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.