Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Provides dental care coverage for foster youth in the United States.
The problem
Foster youth often lack consistent dental care access due to placement instability, Medicaid gaps, and limited resources in the foster care system.
The proposal
The bill expands dental benefits and coverage for foster children under state Medicaid and child welfare programs to ensure preventive and treatment services.
The impact
Foster youth gain improved access to dental care. States may face implementation costs. Dental providers could see increased patient volume from this population.
Dental care prevents infections, pain, and complications that affect school attendance and learning. Foster youth face higher rates of dental problems than other children.
Preventive dental care is cheaper than emergency treatment. Early intervention can prevent expensive procedures and systemic health problems later in life.
Children without dental pain attend school more regularly and concentrate better in class. This directly supports academic success for a disadvantaged group.
Meeting basic healthcare needs helps foster youth develop normally and prepares them for independence. Dental care is essential to overall child welfare.
Expanding Medicaid coverage requires budget increases. States already struggling with foster care funding may face additional financial burdens without federal reimbursement support.
Sudden increase in low-income patients could overwhelm dental providers in some areas. Not all dentists accept Medicaid, which could limit access improvements.
Foster care systems and Medicaid vary widely by state. Coordinating coverage across placement changes and state lines could create administrative complexity and gaps.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.