Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Creates a pilot program to help people identify tick species and reduce tick-related disease risks.
The problem
Ticks spread diseases like Lyme disease and Rocky Mountain spotted fever. People need better ways to identify ticks and understand health risks.
The proposal
Establishes a pilot program to test tick identification methods and education strategies. Likely involves training, resources, or technology to help the public identify ticks accurately.
The impact
Affects public health efforts, healthcare systems, and people at risk for tick-borne illnesses. May help reduce disease transmission and improve early detection.
Helping people identify ticks earlier could prevent tick-borne diseases. Better identification means faster tick removal and lower infection rates.
A pilot program builds awareness about tick risks and safety. Education helps people protect themselves in outdoor areas where ticks live.
Identification tools and education are cheaper than treating tick-borne diseases. Preventing illness costs less than paying for medical care.
A pilot program tests what actually works before full rollout. This allows adjustments based on real results.
The bill summary lacks information on program costs or funding sources. Unclear expenses make it hard to judge fiscal impact.
Without an official summary, the program's size and reach are unknown. It's unclear how many areas or people would be involved.
Success depends on people actually using identification tools and following advice. Voluntary programs may have low participation rates.
Identification and education help individuals but don't reduce overall tick populations. Environmental or habitat solutions may be needed too.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.