Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill establishes mental health and resilience programs in communities nationwide.
The problem
Many Americans lack access to affordable mental health services and community support programs that build resilience and prevent crisis situations.
The proposal
Creates federal funding for community mental health centers, resilience training programs, and support services in underserved areas.
The impact
Low-income individuals, rural residents, and underserved communities gain better mental health access. States and nonprofits receive funding to expand services.
More people in underserved areas would have access to counseling and mental health treatment. This could reduce emergency room visits and hospitalizations related to mental health crises.
Funding for resilience training and support programs can help prevent mental health problems before they become serious. This includes school programs and workplace wellness initiatives.
Nonprofits and community centers receive federal grants to hire staff and expand services. This creates jobs and strengthens community infrastructure.
Early intervention and prevention can lower future healthcare costs by reducing crisis care and hospitalizations related to untreated mental illness.
The bill requires federal funding, which increases government spending and the national budget. Critics argue this money could be spent elsewhere or reduce the deficit.
Expanding mental health services requires trained professionals, which are in short supply. Program success depends on coordination between federal, state, and local agencies.
Programs funded by grants may struggle if federal funding is cut in the future. States and communities may face budget problems when grant money ends.
Without an official summary, it is unclear exactly what programs would be created, how money would be distributed, or what specific services would be required.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
Couldn't load lobbying disclosures right now.