Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill funds research and education about uterine fibroids, a common health condition affecting women.
The problem
Uterine fibroids affect millions of women but receive limited research funding and public awareness compared to other health conditions.
The proposal
Establishes federal research programs and educational initiatives focused on uterine fibroids, including funding for studies and public outreach.
The impact
Women with fibroids gain more treatment options and information. Researchers receive funding. Healthcare providers get better education resources.
More research leads to better treatments and prevention strategies for uterine fibroids. Women suffering from this condition could find relief faster. Better understanding helps doctors provide improved care.
Educational programs help women recognize symptoms early. More awareness means earlier diagnosis and treatment. Public education reduces stigma around reproductive health issues.
Federal funding advances scientific understanding of fibroids. Research can lead to new medicines and procedures. Investment in health research creates jobs for scientists and researchers.
Named after the late congresswoman, this bill continues her legacy of advocating for women's health. Memorializes her commitment to underserved health issues.
Bill requires taxpayer funding at a time of budget constraints. Cost of research programs adds to federal deficit. Funding could be redirected to other priorities.
No specific funding amount is provided in available information. Actual cost to taxpayers remains unknown. Budget impact cannot be fully assessed.
Focuses on one specific health condition rather than broader women's health. Other reproductive health issues may not receive equal attention. Resources might be better spent on conditions affecting larger populations.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.