Latest action: Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
Referred to one or more standing committees for review, hearings, and possible markup.
Specific committees not parsed from action data.
The committee may hold hearings, amend the bill, or let it die without action.
Next: Reported
Full chamber floor — Speaker / Majority Leader controls scheduling
Bill to measure and track how much healthcare freedom individual states allow their residents.
The problem
No clear way exists to compare healthcare freedoms across states. Different states have different rules about medical choices, insurance options, and treatments available to residents.
The proposal
Creates a system to measure and report on healthcare freedom levels in each state. Tracks things like treatment options, insurance choices, and medical decision-making authority available to patients.
The impact
States, patients, and healthcare providers will have data showing healthcare freedom rankings. May influence state policy decisions and patient choices about where to live or receive care.
Gives patients clear information about healthcare freedoms in different states. Helps people make informed decisions about medical care and where to seek treatment.
States ranked lower on healthcare freedom might change policies to compete. Could encourage states to expand patient choices and reduce regulations.
Patients gain better understanding of their medical rights and options. Encourages discussion about what healthcare freedom means and how much patients want.
No official summary provided, so unclear what counts as 'healthcare freedom.' Different people define freedom differently, making fair measurement difficult.
Prioritizing 'freedom' might undervalue important safety regulations that protect patients. Could encourage states to remove protections for vulnerable patients.
Ranking states on freedom without considering access could mislead patients. A state with many choices might still leave people unable to afford care.
Creating and maintaining a measurement system requires government resources. States may need to spend money collecting and reporting healthcare data.
Generated by AI from the bill text. Not a prediction and not legal or policy advice. The percentage is the model's own rating of each item — self-reported, and not a measure of how accurate it is.
Loading map…
Loading...
0 citizens have already voted
Free · No spam · See how your representatives voted
Be the first to weigh in
Your vote starts the conversation
How citizen engagement works
Citizens vote & comment
Public opinion data is aggregated and updated in real time.
Patterns become visible
Representatives can see constituent sentiment broken down by district.
Your voice on the record
Contact your rep directly — one constituent call can shift a staffer's priority list.
Research shows that constituent contacts — especially calls — are among the most effective ways to influence a legislator's position on active bills.
Individual contributions, grouped by employer · FEC
Where their individual donors work · 2026 cycle
Money from people who work there, not from the company. Not tied to this bill.
Itemized individual contributions via FEC, grouped by the employer each contributor self-reported. Companies and unions cannot contribute to federal candidates from their treasuries, so these totals are money from people who work at an employer — never from the organization itself. They are campaign contributions covering a full election cycle and are not connected to this bill.
Senate LDA lobbying disclosures
No lobbying disclosures matched this bill.